Customer case case · Rocketizer Intelligence

BProof grade

14Metrics retained

1Evidence records

AppbrewVendor

Reported outcomes

3–4x ratio versus webConversion ratio versus web — testimonialOutcome window is not disclosed. · Suta executive quoted in Appbrew caseBaseline: Web conversion rate (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct reported range; raw rates are undisclosed.

50% relative increaseConversion uplift versus previous builderOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder conversion rate (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor uplift; raw rates are undisclosed.

30% share of DTC revenueDTC revenue contributionOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: 10% before Appbrew · Formula: 30% - 10% = 20 percentage points and 30% ÷ 10% = 3x.

10% relative increase versus webPre-drape feature usage upliftMeasurement window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Web pre-drape usage (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor uplift; user counts are undisclosed.

400% relative increaseSession-to-purchase upliftOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder level (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor percentage; implies 5x final level if 'increase' is used conventionally.

10% relative increaseAverage order value upliftOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder AOV (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor uplift; raw values are undisclosed.

1300% relative increaseSession-time upliftMeasurement window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder session time (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor percentage; implies 14x final level if used conventionally.

130% relative increaseSessions per user upliftMeasurement window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder sessions per user (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor percentage; implies 2.3x final level.

2600% relative increaseCustomer lifetime value uplift — bodyCohort window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder LTV (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor percentage; conventionally implies 27x final level, conflicting with footer's 2.6x.

2.6x ratio versus previous builderCustomer lifetime value ratio — footerCohort window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder LTV (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct footer ratio; equals 160% uplift, not the body’s 2600% uplift.

800% relative increaseRevenue per session uplift — bodyOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder revenue per session (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor percentage; conventionally implies 9x final level, conflicting with footer's 1.4x.

1.4x ratio versus previous builderRevenue per session ratio — footerOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder revenue per session (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct footer ratio; equals 40% uplift, not the body’s 800% uplift.

1400% relative increaseRevenue per user upliftOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder revenue per user (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor percentage; conventionally implies 15x final level.

30% relative increaseSignup conversion upliftOutcome window is not disclosed. · Appbrew (vendor-hosted official case)Baseline: Previous-builder signup conversion (value undisclosed) · Formula: Direct vendor uplift; raw rates are undisclosed.

Context and boundaries

WorkflowNamed vendor case with extensive percentage outcomes and major conflicts between body percentages and footer ratios.

Implementation??

CaveatsThe +2600% LTV body claim conflicts with 2.6x in the footer.–The +800% revenue/session body claim conflicts with 1.4x in the footer.–No attribution design or raw values are supplied.vendor_owned

Source trail

Suta Appbrew case study
Vendor case reports 3–4x conversion versus web, 50% conversion uplift versus the prior builder, DTC share 10% to 30%, and multiple percentage gains; footer ratios conflict with +2600% LTV and +800% revenue/session statements.
company · accessed 2026-07-13

← Back to customer atlas